Mark Zuckerberg raised concerns about a proposed national AI regulator in a previously unreported call with Donald Trump in mid-August, Politico reports. The two options still on the table are a FINRA-style body funded by the firms it would oversee and an MPA-style voluntary ratings scheme, so the debate is over how much self-regulation rather than whether. It is the latest instance of a documented pattern in which binding review mechanisms come back voluntary after industry contact.
The plan is an independent body modeled on the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, which would review advanced models and test them for risks before wide deployment. This proposal was popularized by Google DeepMind's Demis Hassabis, who proposed a FINRA-style standards body in a July essay and briefed White House officials over the summer. However, Politico makes the sharper observation that FINRA has little involvement in signing off new investment products, which is precisely the pre-deployment function the AI version would exist to perform.
The administration is weighing two paths, according to an administration official, and the second involves less government than the first. David Sacks, Trump's former AI and crypto czar, has proposed a body modeled on the Motion Picture Association, which administers the voluntary film ratings system. Sacks has called the regulator idea a
Este artículo fue escrito con la asistencia de IA.
News Factory APP - noticias agénticas para impulsar tu SEO y AEO.