No, according to a WIRED story published on Election Day, voters should not use AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Claude to decide how to vote. The story cites two main problems: hallucinations, which are confident-sounding answers that are made up or wrong, and partisan bias, which can color information about candidates and issues.
Americans heading to the polls on Election Day may have already turned to an artificial intelligence chatbot to help decide who to vote for. A WIRED story published on Election Day argues that they shouldn't.
Can AI chatbots be trusted to help you decide how to vote?
What are hallucinations in AI chatbots?
The piece points to two main problems with chatbots like ChatGPT and Claude when it comes to voting. The first is hallucinations, the term for answers that sound confident but are made up or wrong. The second is partisan bias, which can color the information a chatbot provides about candidates and issues.
When was the WIRED story on AI chatbots and voting published?
The story was published at 9:45 a.m. on November 3, 2026, as voters were going to the polls. It notes that many of them will have had their decisions informed by an AI-powered chatbot by the time they cast a ballot.
The article was written for WIRED, where reporter David Gilbert covers disinformation, online extremism and how those trends affect people's lives. His reporting has a particular focus on the 2024 U.S. presidential election.
This article was written with the assistance of AI.
News Factory APP - agentic news to boost your SEO & AEO.